Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Draft] Evict the longer time stamp subscription #37025

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DejinChen
Copy link
Contributor

Current mechanism of EnsureResourceForSubscription may evict the Readhandler with more resources or less genaration (older). If same, the latest created one will be selected, in this case, only one subscription can be used for that the new subscription will evict the last one. So add a report timestamp and evict the longest timestamp subscription in this case.

Copy link

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Copy link

PR #37025: Size comparison from e7082e2 to c2a16b2

Full report (1 build for stm32)
platform target config section e7082e2 c2a16b2 change % change
stm32 light STM32WB5MM-DK FLASH 485136 485304 168 0.0
RAM 144912 145072 160 0.1

@@ -1128,6 +1128,15 @@ bool InteractionModelEngine::TrimFabricForSubscriptions(FabricIndex aFabricIndex
{
candidate = handler;
}
// The last report time of this handler is longer
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this the right logic? What is the actual behavior we are trying to implement?

If it's "evict the least newly created subscription", that's what the GetTransactionStartGeneration() thing above was trying to be a proxy for, but without adding new fields to ReadHandler, to avoid memory bloat. But if we are going to add new fields anyway, why wouldn't we just use those fields to track that information? But ideally we would not add fields.

If we really do want to evict handlers based on when they report, then this PR really needs to explain why that's a useful criterion, in the commit message or code comments (or maybe both).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe not the right logic.
GetTransactionStartGeneration returns the generation recorded during the creation of the ReadHandler. If the least newly created subscription has the same generation and resource usage as others, it will be evicted when a new subscription is added. This pattern would repeat, with each subsequent new subscription causing the eviction of the least recently created one. As a result, only the least recently created subscription and those created before the handler became full would remain active until the generation updates. Is this the intended behavior?"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current logic evicts the oldest subscription that satisfies the other criteria, right?

The new code being added would evict the subscription that reported least recently, assuming things are all the same generation. But why is when a subscription reported a relevant thing at all?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DejinChen DejinChen Jan 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.
It has to report once receiving a new subscription.
Maybe we should try not to fill the ReadHandler instead of modifying the evict mechanism?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure what you mean by "try not to fill the ReadHandler"...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It means not to fill the ReadHandler pool in the InteractionModel.

@DejinChen DejinChen changed the title Evict the longer time stamp subscription [Draft] Evict the longer time stamp subscription Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants